![]() Over time, the term “dork” became shorthand for a search query that located sensitive Unintentional misconfiguration on the part of a user or a program installed by the user. The fact that this was not a “Google problem” but rather the result of an often To “a foolish or inept person as revealed by Google“. ![]() ![]() Johnny coined the term “Googledork” to refer Member effort, documented in the book Google Hacking For Penetration Testers and popularisedīy a barrage of media attention and Johnny’s talks on the subject such as this early talk His initial efforts were amplified by countless hours of community Long, a professional hacker, who began cataloging these queries in a database known as the The process known as “Google Hacking” was popularized in 2000 by Johnny Subsequently followed that link and indexed the sensitive information. Information was linked in a web document that was crawled by a search engine that This information was never meant to be made public but due to any number of factors this Is a categorized index of Internet search engine queries designed to uncover interesting,Īnd usually sensitive, information made publicly available on the Internet. Proof-of-concepts rather than advisories, making it a valuable resource for those who need The Exploit Database is a repository for exploits and Lists, as well as other public sources, and present them in a freely-available andĮasy-to-navigate database. The most comprehensive collection of exploits gathered through direct submissions, mailing Non-profit project that is provided as a public service by Offensive Security.Ĭompliant archive of public exploits and corresponding vulnerable software,ĭeveloped for use by penetration testers and vulnerability researchers. That provides various Information Security Certifications as well as high end penetration testing services. The Exploit Database is maintained by Offensive Security, an information security training company 'uri' => normalize_uri(target_uri, '/service/soap/'),įail_with(Failure::Unknown, 'Request failed') unless res & res.code = 200 Req.add_element('AcceptableResponseSchema') 'uri' => normalize_uri(target_uri, '/autodiscover'),įail_with(Failure::Unknown, 'Request failed') unless res & res.code = 503 'PAYLOAD' => 'java/jsp_shell_reverse_tcp' This module was tested with Zimbra Release 8.7.1.GA.1670.UBUNTU16.64 The issues reportedlyĪffect Zimbra Collaboration Suite v8.5 to v8.7.11. Server to get command execution on the host. Used to upload a JSP webshell that can be triggered from the web After gaining an admin cookie the Client Upload servlet is The 'zimbra' credentials to the admin port to retrieve an adminĬookie. Using the user cookie, a server side requestįorgery in the Proxy Servlet is used to proxy an AuthRequest with Zimbra credentials are then used to get a user authentication cookie In the Autodiscover Servlet is used to read a Zimbra configurationįile that contains an LDAP password for the 'zimbra' account. Server side request forgery to get unauthenticated code execution This module exploits an XML external entity vulnerability and a Class MetasploitModule 'Zimbra Collaboration Autodiscover Servlet XXE and ProxyServlet SSRF',
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |